Reply to Crispin Wright and Richard Zach

Reply to Johnson and Wright.

Johnson and Wright ~hereafter J&W! claim, in their brief communication entitled “Reply to Philipona and O’Regan” that there are various difficulties in the reasoning in Philipona and O’Regan’s ~2006! paper entitled “Color naming, unique hues and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties,” which was published in this journal in 2006. These difficulties supposedly pre...

Reply to Crispin et al.: Molecular model that accounts for the biological and physical properties of sialylated Fc.

The robust nature of the biopsychosocial model challenge and threat: a reply to Wright and Kirby.

This article responds to Wright and Kirby's (this issue) critique of our biopsychosocial (BPS) analysis of challenge and threat motivation. We counter their arguments by reviewing the current state of our theory as well as supporting data, then turn to their specific criticisms. We believe that Wright and Kirby failed to accurately represent the corpus of our work, including both our theoretica...

Zach Whalen

Truth Wronged: Crispin Wright's Truth and Objectivity